91��ܽ

Publications 

* denotes students supervised by Dr. Quigley-McBride

If you would like to recieve a PDF copy of a published article, please email Dr. Quigley-McBride at aquigley@sfu.ca

Eyewitness Identification

• Greenspan, R. L., Quigley-McBride, A., Bluestine, M. B., & Garrett, B. (2024). Psychological Science From Research to Policy: Eyewitness Identifications in Pennsylvania Police Agencies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 30(4), 462–478. 
• *Negrabee, D & Quigley - McBride, A. (2024) Investigating Eyewitness Behaviour and Accuracy using Eyewitness Descriptions. SFU Undergraduate Journal of Psychology, 9, 17-23.
• Seale-Carlisle, T. M., Quigley-McBride, A., Teitcher, J. E. F., Crozier, W. E., Dodson, C. S., & Garrett, B. L. (2024). New Insights on Expert Opinion 91��ܽ Eyewitness Memory Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17456916241234837–17456916241234837. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916241234837 
• Quigley-McBride, A., & Wells, G. L. (2023). Eyewitness Confidence and Decision Time Reflect Identification Accuracy in Actual Police Lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 47(2), 333–347.  
• Smith, A. M., Wilford, M. M., Quigley-McBride, A., & Wells, G. L. (2019). Mistaken Eyewitness Identification Rates Increase When Either Witnessing or Testing Conditions Get Worse. Law and Human Behavior, 43(4), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000334
• Quigley-McBride, A., & Wells, G. L. (2018). Fillers Can Help Control for Contextual Bias in Forensic Comparison Tasks. Law and Human Behavior, 42(4), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000295
• Wells, G. L., & Quigley-McBride, A. (2016). Applying Eyewitness Identification Research to the Legal System: A Glance at Where We Have Been and Where We Could Go. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(3), 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.007

Forensic Science

• Alfaro, C. R., Mora, D. U., Hernández, M. C., & Quigley-McBride, A. (2025). A practical approach to mitigating cognitive bias effects in forensic casework. Forensic Science International. Synergy, 10, 100569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100569
• Kukucka, J., & Quigley‐McBride, A. (2025). On the benefits of sequencing case information to combat bias: A commentary on Oberlader and Verschuere (2025). Legal and Criminological Psychology.  
• Quigley-McBride, A., Eldridge, H., & Gardner, B. (2024). Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity. Forensic Science International, 364, 112244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112244
• Growns, B., Dunn, J. D., Mattijssen, E. J. A. T., Quigley-McBride, A., & Towler, A. (2022). Match me if you can: Evidence for a domain-general visual comparison ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 866–881. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02044-2
• Marcon Zabecki, J., Quigley‐McBride, A., & Meissner, C. A. (2022). Information loss, contextual information, and distinctiveness influence how well novice analysts discriminate fingerprints. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(6), 1325–1338.
• Quigley-McBride, A., Dror, I. E., Roy, T., Garrett, B. L., & Kukucka. G. (2022). A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework. Forensic Science International. Synergy, 4, 100216.
• Quigley-McBride, A., Dror, I. E., Roy, T., Garrett, B. L., & Kukucka, J. (2022). A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework. Forensic Science International. Synergy, 4, 100216–100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100216 
• Quigley-McBride, A. (2020). Practical Solutions to Forensic Contextual Bias. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 228(3), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000409 

Other Legally-Relevant Judgments

• Sweet, D. M., Quigley-Mcbride, A., Meissner, C. A., & Ringstad, K. (2023). Perceptions of Movement Patterns and Concealment Detection in Naive Observers and Law Enforcement Officers: A Lens Model Analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221140360
• Garrett, B. L., Crozier, W. E., Dahaghi, K., Gifford, E. J., Grodensky, C., Quigley-McBride, A., & Teitcher, J. (2023). Open prosecution. Stanford Law Review, 75(6), 1365–1430. 
• Quigley-McBride, A., Crozier, W., Dodson, C. S., Teitcher, J., & Garrett, B. (2023). Face Value? How Jurors Evaluate Eyewitness Face Recognition Ability. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 12(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000049
• *Hudachek, L., & Quigley-McBride, A. (2022). Juror Perceptions of Opposing Expert Forensic Psychologists: Preexisting Attitudes, Confirmation Bias, and Belief Perseverance. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 28(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000334

Miscellaneous

• Anderson, C. A., Allen, J. J., Plante, C., Quigley-McBride, A., Lovett, A., & Rokkum, J. N. (2019). The MTurkification of Social and Personality Psychology. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(6), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218798821
• More, K. R., Quigley-McBride, A., Clerke, A. S., & More, C. (2019). Do measures of country-level safety predict individual-level health outcomes? Social Science & Medicine, 225, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.022
• Quigley-McBride, A., Franco, G., McLaren, D. B., Mantonakis, A., & Garry, M. (2018). In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence. PloS One, 13(8), e0202732–e0202732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202732
• Newman, E. J., Sanson, M., Miller, E. K., Quigley-McBride, A., Foster, J. L., Bernstein, D. M., & Garry, M. (2014). People with Easier to Pronounce Names Promote Truthiness of Claims. PloS One, 9(2), e88671–e88671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088671