91ÅÝܽ

MENU

Knowledge Mobilization in a Time of Institutional Reckoning

June 18, 2025
Photo of participants from the Implementation Science Training Initiative (ISTI)

The funding challenges facing universities today reflect more than budgetary strain—they reflect a growing crisis of confidence in higher education’s role in society. In an era of climate urgency, political polarization, and rising inequality, universities are facing pressure to prove their worth. For those of us within the university, this moment invites reflection. If universities want to rebuild trust, they need to move beyond abstraction and toward real-world impact.

That’s where knowledge mobilization comes in—not as a communications strategy, but as a structural shift toward shared purpose, community value, and institutional humility.

This year, I completed certificates through SFU Knowledge Mobilization Hub and Dialogue & Civic Engagement. Through a practicum with (R4FL), I developed a resource guide to support grassroots land defenders in mobilizing knowledge while maintaining knowledge sovereignty—their right to decide how knowledge gets used, how it’s shared, and for what purposes. I also helped develop communications strategies for publications reaching community members, policymakers, funders, and allies. This work—paired with the insights from MobilizeU’s network of practitioners—left me thinking deeply about both the potential and the limits of knowledge mobilization in higher education today.

Knowledge mobilization, at its best, offers a more reciprocal way of relating research to the world. It centres questions like: Useful to whom? Under whose leadership? Toward what ends? Done well, it shifts power in knowledge creation, challenges extractive habits, and values different forms of expertise—lived, experiential, land-based, cultural.

But it also operates within enduring constraints. Universities continue to reward publication over partnership, scale over specificity, and control over meaningful collaboration or shared authorship. Too often, impact is measured in terms that ignore the very communities that knowledge mobilization seeks to support. Meanwhile, those same communities—particularly Indigenous and frontline land defenders—continue to do vital work, often without institutional support or visibility. 

And yet, promising models are out there.

SFU Goldcorp Centre for the Arts

At SFU, initiatives like the Community-Engaged Research Initiative’s Research Shop Program, the Library’s Community Scholars Program, and the  focus on issues of ownership, consent, and shared decision-making. They also provide resources for meaningful collaboration. These efforts show that when universities invest in relationships—not just outputs—they become sites of connection rather than extraction.

My practicum experience sharpened this conviction. Working alongside organizers and educators reminded me that the most impactful research begins with humility. It also highlighted how much knowledge mobilization work can still fall into the gaps: between academic and administrative portfolios, between community timelines and academic calendars, between mandates and metrics. Supporting this work means committing to long-term relationships at a structural level. This means creating space for partnerships, practices, and impacts to emerge organically, not forcing predetermined outcomes. 

For knowledge mobilization to fulfill its potential, its guiding philosophy needs wider adoption. Knowledge mobilization can hold community at the centre of academia and bridge different ways of knowing (both long-standing goals of the university that tend to run into practical barriers). Embracing communities as co-creators of knowledge means valuing personal insight, local wisdom, and the power of stories alongside data. And it means building humility and reciprocity into how institutions operate—not just in principle, but in policy, funding decisions, and how we measure success. 

Of course, not all scholarship should be evaluated through its short-term utility. Insight in many fields emerges slowly. Space for wonder, emergence, and critical thought can be undermined by the need for immediate impact. But when universities claim to partner with communities or shape policy, they have a responsibility to ensure this work respects the rights and priorities of those they engage with.

Knowledge mobilization represents more than a toolkit—it’s a philosophy of public accountability. At a time when universities need to rebuild public trust, knowledge mobilization invites us to reimagine the role of knowledge in society. My work this semester deepened my belief that a university’s greatest potential lies not just in what it knows, but in how it shows up—in dialogue, in reciprocity, and in service to our collective future.

Subscribe and stay informed

By signing up, you will be the first to hear about SFU knowledge mobilization events and updates.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
SMS
Email
Copy